Review
I’m left unsure whether this was remarkably inventive piece of theatre or a bit of a muddle. A bit of both I reckon. I certainly overheard comments supporting both opinions on leaving the theatre. The digital images of ants crawling over the walls/set were effective. The physical theatre bits were mostly successful, tipping into a bit of a jumble occasionally. The 4 strands of the narrative spanned a 70 year period from 1952 to 2022; and took us from
|
Why is the work suitable or not suitable / ready for rural touring ?
|
No. The technical requirements would be beyond most village halls
|
Why would you book them ? or Why wouldn’t you book them ?
|
I don’t think he company would be interested. I overheard a company member saying that they were hoping that an international tour may result from their residency in
|
Why would it be worth pursuing this company to consider work in the future? Or not ?
|
no
|
No comments:
Post a Comment